The 19-Click Graveyard: Why Your Digital Transformation Failed

The 19-Click Graveyard: Why Your Digital Transformation Failed

We wrap our broken habits in code, mistaking friction for security, and call it progress.

The fluorescent hum of the training room is vibrating at a frequency that suggests the building itself wants to leave. I am currently 249 minutes into a session for our new ‘Synergy Flow’ portal, and my right index finger has developed a twitch that feels suspiciously like a rebellion. The trainer, a man whose enthusiasm is so polished it’s practically reflective, just informed us that submitting a simple expense report now requires a journey through 19 separate screens. It used to take four. But the data, he promises, will be ‘cleaner.’ My hand hurts. It’s the same dull ache I felt this morning when I spent nine minutes wrestling with a jar of pickles, only to admit defeat and put it back in the fridge, still sealed, a monument to my own inadequacy and the stubbornness of vacuum-sealed glass.

The Core Confession

We buy these tools because we’ve lost the ability to speak to each other. It’s the expensive act of wrapping our broken, dysfunctional human habits in a layer of sleek, unresponsive code. Digital transformation is rarely about transformation; it’s about insulation.

We assume that if we can just track the failure with 29 different KPIs, the failure will somehow become a metric we can manage, rather than a reality we have to inhabit.

The Physics of Mess: Braking vs. Steering

My driving instructor, a man named Finn N.S. who smells exclusively of wintergreen lifesavers and the interior of a 1989 sedan, once told me that most accidents happen because people try to steer through a mistake instead of just braking. He’d watch me over-correct on a slick patch of road, my hands white-knuckled on the wheel, and he’d sigh. ‘You’re trying to outsmart the physics of your own mess, Finn would say, clicking his tongue. ‘Just stop moving for a second.’ We don’t stop moving in the corporate world. We just buy a more expensive steering wheel that vibrates when we’re about to hit the wall.

“You’re trying to outsmart the physics of your own mess… Just stop moving for a second.”

– Finn N.S., Driving Instructor

Finn N.S. had a point that transcends the suburban streets of my youth. When a process is fundamentally broken-when the communication between departments is a series of passive-aggressive emails and missed deadlines-adding software is like putting a GPS on a car with no engine. You’ll know exactly where you aren’t going.

The Perfect Crime

If the project fails, it wasn’t the leadership; it was the ‘implementation’ or the ‘user adoption’ or the ‘vendor’s lack of support.’ It’s the perfect crime. No one has to be the villain when the software is the scapegoat.

[The software is the scapegoat for a culture that stopped asking ‘why’.]

The Hidden Tax of Distrust

I’m thinking about that pickle jar again. The problem wasn’t the jar, and it wasn’t my hand. It was the friction. In our digital lives, we’ve mistaken more friction for more security, more data for more insight. We’ve built these 19-step workflows because we don’t trust the person on the other end of the screen to do their job without 49 digital guardrails. This lack of trust is the hidden tax of the modern workplace. We spend half our day proving we’re working to the machine, which leaves us exactly half a day to actually do the work. It’s a zero-sum game played on a high-resolution monitor.

Communication Audit: Time Expended

5s

Walk/Talk (Pre-Software)

TO

3 Days

Ticket/Audit Trail (Post-Software)

Example: A five-second conversation turned into a three-day audit trail.

I recall a specific project where we spent $499,000 on a ‘collaboration suite.’ Before the software, people would walk across the hall to ask a question. After the software, they would submit a ticket, wait 9 hours for a response, and then schedule a meeting to clarify the ticket. We didn’t collaborate more; we just documented our distance more efficiently. And we called it progress because the dashboard was blue and had a very nice font.

🔔

You’re probably reading this right now while a notification for a ‘mandatory update’ blinks in the corner of your screen, a digital heartbeat reminding you that you don’t own your tools; they own your time. When did we decide that the ‘system’ was the customer?

The Radical Act of Common Sense

Contrast this with a model that actually respects the physical reality of the problem it’s trying to solve. Look at Bathroom Remodel. In an industry that usually thrives on making customers drive to seven different warehouses to look at beige squares under flickering lights, they changed the physical process first. They didn’t just build a ‘flooring portal’ to make the annoyance digital; they brought the showroom to the front door.

Transformation is Removal, Not Addition

They solved the friction of the experience rather than just digitizing the headache. It’s a radical act of common sense in an age of digital obfuscation. They understood that the transformation isn’t the app; it’s the removal of the 19 steps that shouldn’t have existed in the first place.

I’ve made this mistake myself. I once tried to organize my entire life through a complex series of linked databases. I had 39 different categories for my books, 19 folders for my receipts, and a color-coded calendar that looked like a bag of Skittles exploded. I spent more time maintaining the system than I did living the life the system was supposed to organize. One day, the database crashed. I lost everything. And you know what? My life didn’t stop. The system was a hallucination of control.

Ghost Steering

Finn N.S. would call that ‘ghost steering.’ You’re moving your hands, but the wheels aren’t connected to anything. We click through the 19 screens of the synergy portal and we feel like we’ve accomplished something because we’re tired. But exhaustion isn’t productivity. It’s just the friction of the machine wearing us down. We’ve replaced the satisfaction of completion with the relief of submission.

The Hard Work of Simplicity

We need to stop buying tools to solve human problems. If your team isn’t talking, a chat app will only give them a faster way to ignore each other. The hard work is the conversation. The hard work is looking at the 19 clicks and asking, ‘What would happen if we just stopped doing 15 of these?’ The answer is usually ‘nothing,’ and that’s the scariest part for a middle manager with a budget to spend.

15 Clicks

Steps to Eliminate

The difference between the old way (19 clicks) and the simple way (4 clicks) is 15 steps that breed inaction.

I finally got that pickle jar open, by the way. I didn’t use a special tool or a new ‘opening system.’ I just ran it under some warm water for 29 seconds to loosen the seal. I stopped fighting the friction and just changed the environment. There’s a lesson there for the next time someone tries to sell you a digital transformation that takes more clicks than the old way. Maybe the answer isn’t a more expensive jar opener. Maybe we just need to change the temperature of the room.

The Scariest Part

We’re so afraid of simplicity because simplicity offers no place to hide. In a complex system, you can lose yourself in the gears… The answer is usually ‘nothing,’ and that’s the scariest part.

[The answer is usually ‘nothing’, and that’s the scariest part.]

Digital transformation, as it’s currently sold, is the world’s most expensive invisibility cloak. It allows us to disappear into the data while the actual problems-the ones involving people, emotions, and the messy reality of the physical world-continue to fester just out of sight of the dashboard.

🛑

Letting Go of the Wheel

I look at the ‘Synergy Flow’ portal one last time before hitting ‘Log Out.’ It’s a masterpiece of engineering designed to solve a problem that didn’t exist until we bought the software. We could use a lot more people who aren’t afraid to say that sometimes, the best upgrade is to just let go of the wheel.

Return to Focus